DOI: 10.18503/2658-3186-2022-6-2-35-42
Abstract. Researchers taking up autoetnography are also interested in issues related to meaningful moments that are focused on personal experiences. This text refers to selected issues in terms of terminology and semantics, as well as the epistemological status of autoethnography in (social) research. The concept of change is also of interest, with particular emphasis on the terms used in scientific disciplines and the distribution of accents related to the area in which personal histories have not yet been exposed – scientific biographies and biographical writing related to it. Coming into prominence of personal messages, often on subjects going beyond the scientific continuum, makes the academic community an “interbiographic community” – community which is co-sharing narratives. How many narrations there are in the space for (co)sharing and to what extent personal experience and histories of emotions behind them constitute a methodological tool - one can observe by following the direction of self-reflexive turn within scientific writing and intellectual biographies. The paradigm shift, as a “self-empowered” and leading interpretation of scientific research, can be said to be aimed at overcoming the current canon (fixed theoretical and practical models) whose components lose significance, become outdated, insufficient for the spirit of time, ending in anachronism status.
Keywords: autoetnography, research paradigms, biographical research, scientific biography, source studies.
Author:
Czajkowska А., Research–teaching assistant, Candidate of pedagogical sciences, Research–teaching assistant at the Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
References
1. Alkheit P., The Ponovoczesne calling of society which studies. Critical approach, Terazhnieyszoss, is Man – Edukacya, 2014, no. 4(28), pp. 7–26.
2. Alkheit P. Podeyscie biographic in whole vital studies, Terazhnieyszoss is Man is Education, 2011, no. 3(55), pp. 7–21.
3. Anderson L. Analytical autoethnography, Review of High-quality Sociology, 2014, no. 3(10), pp. 144–167.
4. Assmann Or., Introduction to kulturoznavstva. Basic terms, problems, questions, Poznan, Science and Innovations, 2015, 362 p.
5. Backhmann–medick D., Cultural Turns. New directions in sciences with a culture, Warsaw, Scientific Wing, 2012, 504 p.
6. Bal M., The Wandering concepts in humanism sciences, Warsaw, National Center of Culture, 2012, 392 p.
7. Bonnel V. E., Khunt L., Beyond the Cultural Turn. New Dimensions,e Study of Society and Culture. Los Angeles: California Press, 1999, 361 p.
8. Bron Or. Biograficznoss in researches of andragogicznickh, Conversations of Young Andragoguv, 2009, no. 10, pp. 37–54.
9. Buckhovski M. Magic and ritual, Warsaw, Institute of Culture, 1993, 168 p.
10. To Understand Bulira V. the world: silhouette and creation Agnes Heller, Lectures and Lubelskie seminar, Lublin, UMCS, 2006, pp. 127–154.
11. Connerton P. Seven Tipes of of of Forgetting, Memori Studies, 2008, no. 1, pp.59–71.
12. Connerton P. How societies remember, Warsaw, VUV, 2012, 202 p.
13. Khirsckh M. Famili of frames: pkhotograpkhi, narrative of and of postmemori, Cambridge, Harvard of Universiti Press, 1997, 304
14. Kacperczik Or. Autoethnography are Technik, method, new paradigm? With metodologicznim status of autoethnography, Review of High-quality Sociology, 2014, no. 3(10), pp. 32–74.
15. Koselleck R., Historical Semantics, Poznan, Poznanskie publishing House, 2012, 565 p.
16. Kukhn T., Struktura of scientific revolutions, Warsaw, Aletkheia, 2001, 352 p.
17. Ricoeur P., Existence and khermeneutika. Debates with a method, Warsaw, Pax, 1975, 319 p.
18. Skhoemaker S. People of and of tkheir of Pasts, American Pkhilosopkhical Quarterli, vol. 7, no. 4, 1970, pp. 269–285.
19. Strzeminski V. Teoria of appointment, Lodz, Museum of Art, in Lodz, 2016, 342 p.
20. Voolf V. Moments of Being, London, Mariner Books, 1985, 240 p.
21. Znaniecki F. Method of sociology, Warsaw, PVN, 2009, 399 p.
For citation
Czajkowska А. Human – Word – Paradigm. At the foundations of biographically oriented scientific writing, Gumanitarno-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya [Humanitarian and pedagogical Research], 2022, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 35–42.