DOI: 10.18503/2658-3186-2021-5-1-17-23
Abstract
In modern educational and professional standards, a special place is occupied by competencies associated with the ability of an individual to effectively organize and implement the process of independent learning, as well as to regulate the processes of his self-educational activities, professional development, etc. The article notes that for future professionals, the ability to effectively organize and to realize their own independent work in the process of studying at a university, since this factor has a direct impact on the results of professional training. The article analyzes the approaches of domestic researchers to understanding the essence and content of independent work. The article emphasizes that in order to carry out effective independent work, students must be ready for self-directed learning. The problem of self-directed learning is considered as one of the most urgent for modern pedagogical science and practice. The article presents an analysis of foreign and domestic psychological and pedagogical literature on the problem under consideration. The different approaches of researchers to defining the essence and key components of self-directed learning are outlined. Several points of view of scientists on the definition of the most important personal characteristics that contribute to the effective implementation of self-directed learning are presented. The article also examines the views of domestic and foreign researchers on the formation and development of students' ability to self-directed learning. Special attention is paid to the study of linear, interactive and educational models known in foreign pedagogical science and practice. The article notes that the ability of young people to self-directed learning is a fundamental condition for effective educational activities, professional development and personal development in the modern world. It is emphasized that the strategy of self-guided learning is promising in the context of teaching students in modern higher education, since it meets the requirements of the new reality.
Keywords: independent work, self-directed learning, higher education, personal and professional development, student, professional
Author:
Maria V. Kudryavtseva, Senior Lecturer, Department of social work and law, St. Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design, St. Petersburg, Russia; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
References
1. Belonovskaya I. D., Serebrovskaya T. B. Rol' samoupravlyaemogo obucheniya studentov v universitetskom obrazovanii, Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Sworld, 2012, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 85–88.
2. Bordonskaya L. A., Starostina S. E. Tekhnologicheskie aspekty estestvenno-nauchnogo obrazovaniya stu-dentov-gumanitariev v usloviyakh perekhoda k FGOS VPO, Gumanitarnyi vektor [Humanitarian Vector], 2012, no. 1 (29), pp. 41–48.
3. Vaganova O. I., Lapshova A. V., Koltokhina O. P. Interaktivnye formy organizatsii samostoyatel'noi raboty studentov pedagogicheskogo vuza, Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Problems of modern pedagogical education], 2019, no. 62-2, pp. 43–46.
4. Zimnyaya I. A. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya : ucheb. Posobie, Rostov n/D, Feniks, 1997, 480 p.
5. Kazakova S. V. Organizatsiya samostoyatel'noi raboty bakalavrov v protsesse izucheniya kursa «kul'tura tolerantnosti», Gumanitarnye nauki [The Humanities], 2017, no. 3 (39), pp. 89–95.
6. Kartashova V. N. Ispol'zovanie komp'yuternoi programmy v avtonomnom obuchenii studentov nemets-komu yazyku, Informatsionnye tekhnologii v obespechenii federal'nykh gosudarstvennykh obrazovatel'nykh standartov : sb. nauch. tr. / pod red. O. V. Tarasyuk, Elets, Eletskii gos. un-t im. I. A. Bunina, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 366–374.
7. Kiseleva A. V. Strategiya samoupravlyaemogo obucheniya kak gotovnost' k aktivnomu samostoyatel'nomu poznaniyu, Lichnost' i obshchestvo: nravstvennaya ideya v tsennostnom mire sovremennogo cheloveka : sb. nauch. tr. / otv. red. N. P. Tsepeleva, 2017, pp. 89–94.
8. Nosacheva E. A. Professional'naya avtonomiya kak vazhnaya problema sovremennogo professional'nogo obrazovaniya v Rossii, Trudy Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putei soobshcheniya, 2013, no. 1, pp. 112–117.
9. Noskova T. N., Pavlova T. B., Yakovleva O. V. Analiz otechestvennykh i zarubezhnykh podkhodov k po-stroeniyu peredovykh obrazovatel'nykh praktik v elektronnoi setevoi srede, Integratsiya obrazovaniya [Integration of Education], 2016, vol. 20, no. 4 (85), pp. 456–467.
10. Personifikatsiya vysshego professional'no-pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya: na puti k samoupravlyae-momu obucheniyu: monografiya / pod. red. M. B. Esaulovoi, Saint-Petersburg, SPGUTD, 2010, 160 p.
11. Sagitova R. R. Genezis sushchnosti ponyatiya samoobrazovaniya v istorii razvitiya otechestvennoi i zaru-bezhnoi pedagogiki, Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2010, no. 1, pp. 35–41.
12. Sukhobskaya G. S. Ponyatie «zrelost' sotsial'no-psikhologicheskogo razvitiya cheloveka» v kontekste and-ragogiki, Novye znaniya, 2002, no. 4, pp. 17–20.
13. Shitov S. B. Samoupravlyaemoe obuchenie kak faktor formirovaniya lichnosti sovremennogo spetsialista (sotsial'no-filosofskii vzglyad), Aktual'nye voprosy obshchestvennykh nauk v sovremennykh usloviyakh razvitiya strany : sb. nauch. tr. po mater. Mezhunar. nauchn.-pr. konf. / pod red. T. K. Rostovskoi, Saint-Petersburg, Innovatsionnyi tsentr razvitiya obrazovaniya i nauki, 2016, pp. 24–27.
14. Shchegoleva O. N. Aktualizatsiya samostoyatel'noi kontroliruemoi raboty v novoi obrazovatel'noi paradigme, Integratsiya obrazovaniya [Integration of Education], 2007, no. 2, pp. 34–45.
15. Hammon M. & Collins R. Self-directed learning: Critical practice, London, Nichols/GP Publishing, 1991, p. 224.
16. Hiemstra R., & Brockett R. Reframing the Meaning of Self-Directed Learning: An Updated Model, Processing of the 54th Adult Education Research Conference, Saratoga Spring, 2012, pp. 155–161.
17. Garrison D.R. Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model, Adult Education Quarterly, 1997, vol. 48, pp. 18–33.
18. Gibbons M. The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002, 183 p.
19. Grow G. Teaching learners to be self-directed: A stage approach , Adult Education Quarterly, 1991, vol. 41, pp. 125–149.
20. Knowles M. S. Self-directed learning. A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Cambridge Adult Education, 1975, 135 р.
21. Merriam S. B., Caffarella R. S. & Baumgartner L. M. Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.), San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2007, 533 p.
22. Li W., Wright P. M., Rukavina P. B., & Pickering M. Measuring students’perceptions of personal and social responsibility and the relationship to intrinsic motivation in urban physical education, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2008, vol. 27(2), pp. 167–178.
23. Spear G. E. & Mocker D. W. The organizing circumstance: Environmental determinants in self-directed learning, Adult Education Quarterly, 1984, vol. 35, pp. 1–10.
24. Stockdale S. L., & Brockett R. G. Development of the PRO-SDLS: A measure of self-direction in learning based on the Personal Responsibility Orientation Model, Adult Education Quarterly, 2011, vol. 61(2), pp. 161–180.
25. Tough A. M. The Adult's Learning Projects: A Fresh Approach to Theory and Practice in Adult Learning, Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1971, 191 p.
For citation
Kudryavtseva M. V. Self-directed Learning as an Important Condition of Effective Implementation of Independent Work of Students, Gumanitarno-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya [Humanitarian and pedagogical Research], 2021, vol.5, no. 1, pp. 17–23.